The Oklahoma County Commissioners have approved federal funding for a proposed mental health facility to be built at the site of the planned county jail near East Grand in southeast Oklahoma City. The decision, made during a heated public meeting on Monday, has sparked controversy over legal, zoning, and financial concerns.
Public Opposition and Legal Concerns
Citizens voiced frustration over the project, criticizing the commissioners for proceeding despite unresolved legal issues and a lack of zoning approval for the site.
- Christopher Johnston, a vocal opponent, expressed dissatisfaction with how the project has been handled, calling it flawed from the start.
- Mark Faulk, representing the People’s Council for Justice Reform, argued that the commissioners are taking significant financial risks, likening the decision to gambling with taxpayer money.
The controversy intensified after the Oklahoma City Council denied a zoning permit for the jail in July. In response, the commissioners filed a lawsuit to challenge the decision. Opponents warn that if the lawsuit is unsuccessful, taxpayers could bear the burden of repaying the federal funds used for the mental health facility.
Commissioners’ Defense
Despite the criticisms, Commissioner Brian Maughan clarified that the vote was a procedural step to secure funding and did not authorize construction. The commissioners plan to vote on the groundbreaking of the facility during a meeting on December 18.
“This is just the legality part that moves us forward to the next phase,” Maughan explained, emphasizing that further votes will be required before construction begins.
Role of Interim Commissioner
Further controversy arose regarding Chief Deputy Joe Blough, who stepped into Commissioner Carrie Blumert’s seat after her resignation in September.
Some citizens questioned Blough’s authority to vote on the matter.
Blough defended his role, citing legislative provisions that allow a chief deputy to serve temporarily following a vacancy. “I am doing the very best that I can,” Blough stated, highlighting his 19 years of experience.
Next Steps and Pending Opinion
The commissioners are awaiting an opinion from Attorney General Gentner Drummond on the lawsuit’s legal implications. The upcoming December 18 meeting will determine whether groundbreaking for the facility will proceed.
Broader Implications
The project underscores the challenges of balancing urgent community needs, such as mental health care, with legal and financial accountability. If successful, the facility could provide much-needed mental health resources. However, unresolved zoning and legal challenges pose risks that could delay or derail the initiative.
As the debate continues, the outcome of the December 18 vote and the attorney general’s opinion will play a pivotal role in shaping the future of the project.
Related topics:
