California’s behavioral health system, under Governor Gavin Newsom, has seen significant reforms aimed at addressing the state’s mental health crisis. Billions of dollars have been invested in new programs and services. However, these advances are now at risk due to proposed federal spending cuts that could drastically impact Medicaid funding.
Medicaid, known as Medi-Cal in California, is a vital source of funding for the state’s mental health services, which include therapy, medication, psychiatric evaluations, and crisis support. Many of the state’s behavioral health initiatives rely heavily on Medicaid funding. If these federal cuts proceed, state and local programs may face substantial financial shortfalls.
Alex Briscoe, a health policy expert with the Public Works Alliance, emphasized that any significant reduction in Medicaid funding would threaten the state’s behavioral health reforms. “When you remove resources of this size, everything is at risk,” Briscoe said. “The system is still in development, and the timing of these potential cuts makes it an extremely difficult situation.”
A recent House budget resolution proposed cutting $880 billion from Medicaid over the next decade, though the final budget still needs approval from both chambers of Congress. If passed, the cuts would impact the care of four in 10 Californians who rely on Medi-Cal, including access to essential behavioral health services. Roughly two-thirds of California’s $161 billion Medicaid spending is funded by the federal government.
The proposed cuts come at a time when California is grappling with rising mental health issues. Nearly half of the state’s adults report symptoms of anxiety or depression, and about 1.2 million people live with serious mental health conditions. Opioid overdose deaths, driven in large part by fentanyl, have surged in recent years, further complicating the state’s crisis.
Governor Newsom has made strides to reform the behavioral health system, such as expanding treatment beds, increasing the availability of mental health services in schools, and distributing opioid overdose reversal medication. While the state uses various funding sources for these programs, Medicaid remains an essential pillar of support.
Health Secretary Kim Johnson reaffirmed the state’s commitment to ensuring all Californians have access to behavioral health care, noting that investing in these services helps save lives and reduces long-term costs.
However, experts warn that Medicaid cuts could worsen the state’s mental health crisis. Corey Hashida, a senior associate at the Steinberg Institute, a mental health advocacy group, said these cuts would lead to more people going without treatment. This, in turn, could result in job loss, school dropout, or even homelessness for those struggling with mental health issues.
Additionally, federal behavioral health grants are also at risk. Recently, the California Department of Health Care Services lost $120 million in funding for initiatives to combat overdose deaths and expand opioid treatment access. Experts worry that further cuts could cause severe disruptions to California’s mental health infrastructure.
The federal government has several options for reducing Medicaid spending, such as imposing work requirements or restructuring funding formulas. If Congress proceeds with these cuts, California could face losses of $10 to $20 billion annually in federal Medicaid funds.
One key area of concern is the Affordable Care Act’s Medicaid expansion, which allowed many childless adults to access critical mental health treatment. Without these funds, vulnerable populations could lose access to necessary care. Michelle Doty Cabrera, executive director of the County Behavioral Health Directors Association, called the expansion a “game changer” and warned that cutting these funds would be devastating.
California’s counties are responsible for providing specialized mental health services to people with severe conditions. These services are funded through a combination of local revenue, state dollars, and Medicaid funds. In Los Angeles County, for instance, 30% of the budget for behavioral health services comes from Medicaid. A reduction in Medicaid funding would put immense pressure on local budgets and could hinder the ability of counties to provide services.
Moreover, California relies on federal “waivers” to use Medicaid funds for non-traditional services, such as housing support and care coordination, which are essential for successful behavioral health treatment. Without these waivers, the state could lose flexibility in how it provides care, jeopardizing progress made in treating substance use and mental health disorders.
As the federal government considers these cuts, the future of California’s behavioral health system remains uncertain, and mental health advocates fear the state’s progress could be undone.
Related topics:
