The “Handbook of Child Psychology” is an immense reference work in child development, stretching across four volumes and nearly 5000 pages. It’s a foundational resource in the field, offering comprehensive coverage of children’s behavior and development. However, its vast scope leaves out something surprising: play and curiosity, two key elements of childhood, receive little to no attention.
Despite the handbook’s claim to be an authoritative account of child development, only a small fraction—just 10 pages out of 5,000—focuses on play. Curiosity is even more underrepresented, with exploration mentioned on just one page. This raises the question: how could such essential aspects of childhood be so overlooked in a scholarly work of this magnitude?
One explanation lies in the strong connection between developmental psychology and the school system. Schools serve as the primary setting for research in this field, offering a readily available group of subjects—children. Many studies rely on the school environment because it is easier to observe and control children in this structured setting, rather than in less controlled spaces like playgrounds or neighborhood streets.
This close relationship between developmental psychology and education means that much of the research focuses on school-related behaviors—what children learn, how they process information, and how they interact with authority figures. As a result, aspects like play, exploration, and curiosity, which often occur outside the rigid structure of schooling, are neglected. Researchers are more likely to study behaviors that are measurable and fit the controlled environment of the classroom or laboratory.
The historical roots of developmental psychology are closely tied to schooling. Early psychology, including the development of IQ tests by Alfred Binet for the French educational system, was designed to address educational needs. The school system’s emphasis on measurable outcomes, such as test scores and academic achievement, has heavily influenced the direction of research in child development.
Furthermore, the school system itself creates a narrow view of children’s development. Schools are structured environments where children are told what to do, when to do it, and how to do it. This limits opportunities for children to take initiative, make choices, or engage in self-directed exploration. In contrast, play is often treated as a break from work, reinforcing the idea that play is trivial compared to more serious academic pursuits.
Moreover, the school system is competitive, ranking children based on their academic performance and creating social hierarchies. Developmental psychologists often study these dynamics, assuming they reflect universal childhood experiences. However, research in non-schooled societies suggests that such hierarchies may not be as natural as they seem.
To fully understand child development, it is essential to broaden the scope of research. Focusing solely on children within the confines of school overlooks the powerful impact of play, curiosity, and age-mixed interactions. These elements are crucial for children’s growth and learning but are increasingly rare in modern society. To capture the full potential of childhood, research must move beyond the school paradigm and study children in diverse settings where these natural behaviors can flourish.
Related topics:
